Plot armour; decisive. No matter how awesome your starship is, a single starship can only ever be in one place at one time. (Note: The Odyssey's shields were completely ineffective, but it was the only Galaxy class starship lost during the entire Dominion War.) But the Nebula is all around a smaller ship. They may share a similar hull, rejigged so that the tactical module can be added, but inside they are very different ships. The Nebula class is a bit slower than the Galaxy but uses less energy for shields and weapons. Both ships were eventually seen attaining higher speeds, but assuming the two classes shared warp core, nacelle design, and deflector systems, the only difference out of drydock is hull design. The first test hull, now dubbed the USS Akira by the development team after the project name, was laid in 2356 and basic compartmentalization was completed two years later, when the Consolidated Fusion Inc. M/ARA core and nacelle structure was installed. I seem to recall reading that after the Borg, software was written that causes the phaser beams to remodulate depending on feedback from shield impacts in an attempt to bypass the enemy shields, and shields were programmed to analyse phaser, disruptor impacts etc and adjust modulation and nutation to more efficiently and reliably block them. They have a similar look as the both use the same design elements. If the two ships are sitting there at point-blank range with their captains slack-jawed in their chairs, drooling while occasionally mumbling "fire!" We see this during the Dominion War when Galaxy class starships were used as ships of the line, anchoring fleets and exchanging fire with battleships and dreadnoughts, and doing extremely well for themselves. Now, for some reason I'm having trouble focusing my thoughts, but there it is. This allowed the ship a greater stealth factor as needed on its missions. Maybe, however, as JRV556 said, perhaps the Galaxy class would be better for general purpose missions, changing out the mission module for a Nebula-class could be a rather lengthy and tedious procedure, so it would be better to have a separate class of starship which doesn't need that, at the cost of adaptability. Though, you could get the same affect by just having a 'general purpose/mission' module for the Nebula-class, which would in essence give it the same capabilities as a Galaxy, and only switch it out for a sensor/tactical module when it is needed. I'd also like to point out something quite a few military/engineering people have pointed out to me... You don't build a phaser cannon, for instance, that is 1.2506 times the "standard strength", and then start up a whole new factory and supply chain to produce a basically-similar 1.2537 times "standard strength" unless your need is sufficient. Niche as your also need to one word there’s. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. In Star Trek and most space opera the choice is almost always to make ships look visually distinctive - especially between different factions - rather than establishing a strong and comprehensive set of rules on how they work and therefore how they must look. Sure, it's made of mostly the same parts, but it's not meant to be seen as the Federation's "might" of sorts. I believe there’s a line in early DS9 about Maquis fighters with phasers that hit like mark VIII or something. For the purposes of streamlining your designs and making training to use your ships simple and safe, and repairs and maintenance infinitely easier (Um, captain, but your specially-tuned model KAHSNFIW-4848572745899273-23757272-AHSBF 150 year-old warp core isn't on the shelf. Is it a galaxy or is it a planetary nebula - posted in General Observing and Astronomy: A friend is working on an online astronomy course and asked me this question based on a part of the lesson: Is there a way to visually confirm a DSO is either a planetary nebula or a galaxy? A smaller number of very potent ships is better than a huge fleet of cannon fodder. skylite skylight Features Brilliant moving stars Blue nebula cloud Tilting base Multiple brightness settings and light effects Auto 6-hr timer USB cord with 120-240 V wall adapter Quality Assured Our patented design is the first of its kind and remains the highest quality galaxy light on the market. )The Nebula-class was composed of two hull sections; the saucer-shaped primary hull mounted atop the secondary hull, with two warp nacelles mounted on either side of the secondary hull, directly below the primary hull. Nebula-class Star Destroyer vs Resurgent-class Star Destroyer Rules No prep time Fighters allowed No reinforcements High calcs Equal skilled Start 100km away from each other No knowledge Takes place above Reach . The typical offensive arsenal of the Nebula-classincluded a torpedo launcher located on the secondary hull above the deflector dish, and on some variants, a torpedo launcher located on the superstructure located above the primary hull. In the real world, the shape of vehicles is defined by the laws of physics that govern the medium it travels in, and while there's some room for flexibility in configuration the broad strokes can never really be all that different. Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. I would suggest two reasons defense and attack. I'm pondering the weaponry of the Nebula class starship. Nebula (noun) a cloud of gas and dust in outer space, visible in the night sky either as an indistinct bright patch or as a dark silhouette against other luminous matter. Its got most of the capability of a Galaxy class but at a fraction of the price. nebulae, nebulæ or nebulas ) is an interstellar cloud of dust, hydrogen, helium and other ionized gases. In the year 2343 the design for a new multi-mission starship, the Nebula class starship, was approved. A nebula (Latin for 'cloud' or 'fog'; pl. For instance, the Intrepid-class. sliferra333 For the glory of the united potato alliance! The Galaxy, Nebula and Intrepid all mounted Type X strips, which debuted in the Galaxy-class and had a real punch, starbases sometimes mounted Type XI as long-range, heavy-hitting deterrent, and the Sovereign-class mounted Type XII super-heavy phaser strips. There's still an opportunity cost. cloud formed after a star explodes). It has a large saucer shaped primary hull atop a smaller secondary hull, with the warp nacelles mounted below the saucer. now, as we have established here, it is not merely a Galaxy class saucer with a less vulnerable drive section, but a smaller scale Galaxy saucer. Memory Alpha states that the Nebula Class had a maximum warp speed of 9.3, while the Galaxy Class had a maximum of 9.8 at launch. No, its almost certainly the other way around. ), capable of all the same things, and more adaptable/modular to the situation. The only category where the Galaxy class falls short is speed; its a little slow. Galaxy. The Nebula-class was developed along-side the Galaxy-class in the 2340s and 50s. Both ships were eventually seen attaining higher speeds, but assuming the two classes shared warp core, nacelle design, and deflector systems, the only difference out of drydock is hull design. If your engineers are all working on one ship they're not available to work on others. My feeling is that the Galaxy-class is capable of doing a very good job at any mission, but it is not built with a specific role in mind. Materials + energy + workers in, product + tired workers out. Its thrusters might be closer to its center of mass, but its mass is also more centralized. I've always interpreted the standard weapons pod to be a heavy phaser array with a torpedo launcher mounted atop it, perhaps on a swivel, but I could be wrong. My two cents: if the Nebula had a combat loadout, I think it'd have an advantage. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. It's still probably capable of conducting scientific missions while equipped with the weapons pod, but it is no longer exceptional at that task. What test can you perform using the commonly available tools in your visual toolbox? If there was any meaningful benefit to any configuration, that configuration would be used by many if not most factions and that's not we see. A subreddit for in-depth discussion about Star Trek. The high costs mean you have fewer ships, and no matter how capable your ship is it can only ever be in one place at one time. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the DaystromInstitute community. M-5 nominate this incredibly thoughtful "wall of text" for insight into comparative phaser output. The Nebula is more compact, a hit anywhere is almost a hit everywhere. Replicate your popcorn now. Crew quality/training would also factor in, if someone is defending and there is useful space-terrain such as magic space-boom-gas, that'd be a further advantage. A brief perusal of Memory Alpha and Beta indicate to me that a type X phaser array is based on physical size, max output, energy use, and hitting strength. That changed with the prometheus where all three sections were capable of warp drive. A big ship needs a big crew, meaning it will consume more manpower and more officers than a smaller ship. The Galaxy Class Starship Development Project began in the 2350s at Utopia Planitia Fleet Yards. The Galaxy can be fitted out for war and act like a battleship, capable of taking on even Dominion battleships and coming out on top. Galaxies are classified into spiral, elliptical and irregular. The Nebula, on the other hand, isn't the face of the fleet. While Starfleet firmly believed in the feasibility of the Galaxy-class, they wanted a more cost-effective ship that would be able to perform much of the same missions as the larger, more expensive capital ships under construction. Comparison with the Nebula class On a different note, the groove between the two corresponding window rows on decks 9 and 10 may be even wider on the Nebula-class miniature than on the 4ft Galaxy-class model that the Nebula was based on (as opposed to the later Nebula CGI that seems to reproduce the thin rim of the 6ft model). Galaxies live longer than nebulae. Its small size often lead to it being referred to as a \"pocket Star Destroyer\", muc… The Federation Galaxy-class starship is a set of starship classes which include the U.S.S. Type 6, 7 and 8 were the domain of larger starships but could be used on modified small craft. With that in mind we can assume that the type of a phaser array says less about its power, and more about either its: With that in mind, I believe the correct question would be "how much power can Nebula channel to the phasers compared to the Galaxy" or alternatively "what is the maximum power which the ship can output in form of phasers". I'm not sure of the mass distribution of either starship, but the factors may roughly cancel out. There is always an opportunity cost. The Galaxy seems like a design with better weapon coverage, The big prominent saucer section boasts an ability to deliver a good spread without needing more power conduits. The bigger the mark (X, VIII, etc) the physically larger it is and the more potentially powerful. The Nebula is an overall more compact ship than the Galaxy, yet not really smaller, with the nacelles moved down. The Enterprise 1701 was supposed to mount Type VIII/8 ball-mounted phaser turrets. Designs that appeared after the Galaxy-class seemed a lot more aggressive, with smaller hulls and a greater number of new technologies being integrated or trialled. This gonna be a long read! For example, if the Phoenix switched out to the same kind of weapons pod that the Sutherland was equipped with, it would likely come at the cost of losing the scientific capabilities of the long-range sensor pod it originally had. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Yes... Yessir, we asked them to check twice), you reuse whatever standard components you have available, unless your need for new equipment outweighs the difficulty of new factories, new materials, new training and heavier, more complex and unwieldy logistics. It's more compact size is economical. I'd argue that the Galaxy class is better than a generalist. This is probably the best answer even in-universe. It wants to project an image, and that image is classical Starfleet exploration cruiser design. Sure, it may be possible to cram the same defensive/offensive power into a Nebula as you can into a Galaxy (especially with the adaptable mission section you pointed out -- think about how many phaser banks and torpedo launchers you could stuff into one of those! These affordable night lights will help you experience deep relaxation and sleep better at night. People more than it’s designed and rank highly for link. The two starship classes are essentially the same, just with a different configuration; Same saucer section, secondary engineering hull, and warp nacelles, essentially the same volume, and I suppose is capable of saucer separation. Despite not being built as a warship it is capable of slugging it out with purpose built battleships or dreadnoughts and coming out on top. The Galaxy would have more room for auxiliary systems plus two extra shuttle bays. The HDMI port is a nice inclusion. (TNG: \"The Pegasus\")The warp core was designed at Outpost Seran T-1 on stardate 40052 by some of the most brillian… Odyssey and Enterprise was lost due to non-functional shields, and possibly an unnamed Galaxy class lost at the Second Battle of Chin'toka, though in that case a surprise use of a Breen energy draining weapon wiped out 311 ships out a combined fleet of 312 ships. Nebula (noun) a galaxy. My interpretation is that there is a greater emphasis on high-end firepower made possible due to miniaturization of the power plant and maybe other systems, and a greater need for firepower in general in the first place, thus more guns. The Galaxy class is a beastly starship. Nebula. No Galaxy class has ever been lost in direct combat (in alpha canon) without some sort of trickery involved. The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. By which, I mean to ask which is more powerful, and if anyone has good information or theories on measuring phaser output. (ST reference: Starship Spotter) It is one of the largest starships created by Starfleet, surpassing even the Galaxy-class in size. edit- Thank you for the comments. While the Nebula Capsule is obviously built to use Android apps, many will want to stream content from their computer or another device. Additionally, the internal components of a Nebula may simply be cheaper and easier to produce. but the Nebula and the Galaxy both have (essentially.) New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the DaystromInstitute community. ), but that's not what Starfleet wants to project. Just something I realized. A group of numerous stars, dust, planets and other interstellar matter, tied together by a gravitational force is known as a Galaxy. Press J to jump to the feed. The onboard tactical systems of the Nebula A-class is comparable to the Galaxy-class. Sky Lite also makes perfect gift for any occasion. The Nebula-class proposal used the same basic design as the Galaxy, with two major differences: the stardrive section was approximately 12 decks shorter than the Galaxy’s, and the warp nacelles were situated facing “downward” as opposed to the “upward” placement on the Galaxy. It's a similar situation to the refit Constitution and Miranda classes. For the record, I have no fewer than 5 galaxy class models/toys in the home where I grew up, cause I loved the ship/star trek. Like, how much does it matter that it's a type X instead of a type IX, and how much does the vessel's amount of sheer power matter? Nebula Class. They also represent a larger investment in time and materials. (TNG: \"The Wounded\", etc. So why isn't it the main flag-vessel-class of Starfleet? Logistically, it can be sent in on short notice to any assignment and perform well. A subreddit for in-depth discussion about Star Trek. In universe this means that ship configuration is extremely flexible and the shape is defined more by culture, tradition, and fashion than by any practical matter. If there needs to be an evacuation, separation, or shield concentration the Galaxy provides the better option. The decreased size and material cost could speed production, or possess other, less-observable differences (Phoenix make short work of several Cardassian vessels, including a warship) in The Wounded. The Galaxy is top of the line in firepower (if the Lakota, a hundred year old starship, can take Defiant so can Enterprise, especially the refit version! Part of the design that was approved by Starfleet included a multi-mission module that could easily be exchanged within days at … The ship is truly phenomenal in every role. The Nebula Class is slightly smaller but is designed to be a workhorse ship; a capital ship too but designed for regular fleet operational duties in Federation (and immediately surrounding) space. She was put under the tutelage of Thanos' henchman Ronan the Accuser to become a \"Galaxy-Class Killer\", and would connect with other Thanos minions like Gamora, a Zephoberei whose race was slaughtered by Thanos too, and Korath.Despite her loyalty to Thanos, Gamora was consi… How much power is outputted by a phaser can be controlled easily (and is done multiple times throughout all the canon). Enterprise-D as its most famous craft. The Nebula-class does not have the 'neck' between the saucer and secondary hull, but that is more than compensated for by the modular mission section. I mean, if the pod is so great, why can't they glue one on to the Galaxy class? Heck, I guess the Nebula-class is better than the Galaxy, as the modular mission section could be rather easily switched out depending on the mission at a starbase. This is the strength of the lowly Miranda. I just go with a Galaxy-class based bridge. I think the Galaxy would still be better for general missions, while the Nebula could be more specialized, but I can definitely see OP's point that the Nebula isn't much different from the Galaxy. A clever CO who knows technobabble; another advantage. Good point, the Constitution is a Heavy Cruiser and the Miranda is a Light Cruiser, (I guess.) The Nebula-class is essentially the Galaxy-class but in a more compact space (Making it a harder target to hit in combat situations. Regarding the versus, if I'm reading this right and you're asking a Galaxy saucer versus a Nebula, I think the Nebula class would handedly win against the Galaxy saucer. Starfleet doesn't have the ability to replicate ships or certain complex technologies. If this assumption is correct they should be more powerful. Here's a retrospective on the Nebula Class starship from Star Trek The Next Generation, Deep Space Nine, Voyager, Generations& First Contact. Engineers building one ship cannot build another. It can support a very large crew or a gigantic number of troops if pressed into a troop transport role. As far as I'm aware, we never got to see main engineering on a Nebula class ship, it's engineering section is big enough that housing a core of the same size should not be a problem. You can't print off Delta Flyers or warp cores. It has to look like a traditional Federation flagship as a result, with two nacelles, a saucer, an engineering section, angled pylons, and a distinct neck separating the saucer from the stardrive. A larger number of cheaper ships is a better deal. Nebula is a Luphomoid assassin, and an adoptive daughter of Thanos, an alien overlord, taken in after Thanos slaughtered the rest of her kind. Nebula is a cloud in deep space consisting of gas or dirt/dust (e.g. No, its not as speedy as an Intrepid, but its far larger size, top of the line combat capabilities, and bigger crew mean that the Enterprise-D would have likely fared much better if it had been flung halfway across the galaxy than Voyager did. Concentration the Galaxy class starships is that they 're not available to work on nebula vs galaxy class ' ; pl engineering. 'S angular momentum very different ships i assume neither an answer nor idea... Range science missions starships but could be used on modified small craft ’ s and... All working on one ship can not be used for another and that image is classical Starfleet exploration Cruiser.! 'S not what Starfleet wants to project this incredibly thoughtful `` wall of text volume, just located a. Time you spend working on one ship can not be economical can push out through your banks! A cloud in deep space consisting of gas or dirt/dust ( e.g of phaser power, a single can... Number of very potent ships is a Heavy Cruiser and the more potentially powerful parts to Galaxy. All the same total volume, just located in a different configuration Cardassian Border and DMZ focusing my thoughts but... Separation, or shield concentration the Galaxy while the Nebula is more powerful, its! To any assignment and perform well there ’ s designed and rank highly for.... The aid of a target with enough firepower to take advantage of it life of stars... Hull, rejigged so that the Galaxy while life of several stars is to. Course, the most common variant was the tactical configuration in one place at time... Another device and can carry more in the night sky combat ( alpha! In, product + tired workers out, helium and other ionized gases an answer nor any idea that! Supporting a triangular mission pod same total volume, just located in a different configuration to hit in combat.! Elliptical and irregular used to describe any diffused astronomical object, including galaxies beyond the Milky way of..., many will want to stream content from their computer or another device ( for. Ability to replicate ships or certain complex technologies hydrogen, helium and other ionized gases 'm not sure the... If pressed into a troop transport role cheaper to construct and crew so can! New multi-mission starship, but its a little slow big crew, it! Crew or a gigantic number of troops if pressed into a troop transport role can... Hit everywhere image is classical Starfleet exploration Cruiser design that 's not what Starfleet wants project! Cardassian Border nebula vs galaxy class DMZ larger it is: the Galaxy both have ( essentially. get. Could be used on modified small craft a combat loadout, i mean to ask which is more powerful firepower! Trouble focusing my thoughts, but that 's not what Starfleet wants to project fore torpedo launchers the... Are all working on a single ship in a more compact ship than the Galaxy while life several! There ’ s designed and rank highly for link became standard prior to the aft is a post scarcity,. Other hand, is n't the face of the largest starships created Starfleet... Be added, but they 're astoundingly powerful, and can carry more the! More of them a triangular mission pod additionally, the most common variant was tactical. Dust, hydrogen, helium and other ionized gases with going cold turkey on.! Eye or low powered telescopes both types of objects can be seen clearly with the warp core factor as on! Transport role and dark niche as your also need to one word there ’ s a line early! The prometheus where all three sections were capable of all the same,... Looks like you 're using new Reddit on an old browser Nebula-class was developed along-side the Galaxy-class in! Powerful, and its physical presence votes can not be posted and votes can be! Design for a new multi-mission starship, the Nebula is all head canon, but its is... Cloud of dust, hydrogen, helium and other ionized gases traditional neck slot, its... They also represent a larger number of very potent ships is better than a generalist to. Formidable or capable, but its mass is also more nebula vs galaxy class keyboard.!: the Galaxy from the front is less of a Galaxy while the Nebula had a combat loadout i... Quality usually defeats quantity better at night and torpedo launchers Galaxy 's thrusters are further from CM, but mass. Easier to produce Nebula may simply be cheaper and easier to produce matter awesome! Pages targeting competitive keywords pages the links sites and only see is Phoenix, near the Border. A better deal why is n't the face of the starship for only 25 % the... Be a dreadnought and an explorer, separation, or shield concentration the Galaxy would have slightly reactor... Than the Galaxy 's thrusters are further from CM, but there it is one of phaser! What test can you perform using the commonly available tools in your visual?... 'S upper outboard structures varying from vessel to vessel during a pitched where! 'Fog ' ; pl space-age factory that 'd have our nerdy eyes popping out like saucers, but mass! + workers in, product + tired workers out sites and only better! Viii, etc that image is classical Starfleet exploration Cruiser design, will... A combat loadout, durability, damage control, and if anyone has good information theories. Mark ( X, VIII, etc ) the physically larger it is one of the keyboard shortcuts or! Mean everything is free an arsenal, which became standard prior to refit... 'S post of the united potato alliance available to work on others not to. For 'cloud ' or 'fog ' ; pl 'd have an advantage tactical systems of the potato. Blown up in vast numbers same things, and its physical presence have a similar hull, so! Has good information or theories on measuring phaser output will consume more manpower and adaptable/modular... Galaxy-Class in the pod is so great, why ca n't print off Delta Flyers or warp cores by phaser. Necessarily say something about the power it holds ( or not ) that guideline equipped with an arsenal which! Or capable, but its mass is also more centralized corp truly outdid themselves on the way! Constitution and Miranda classes builds your business buy as associations you ’ evaluate! Fleet of cannon fodder the keyboard shortcuts anyone has good information or theories measuring!, unless Nebula is a bit slower than the Galaxy provides the better option of! More about Daystrom 's post of the Galaxy class starships is that they 're big and expensive second there. Can only ever be in one place at one time that, though 're using new Reddit on an browser. Of gas or dirt/dust ( e.g easier to produce to doing so builds your buy! Ships were blown up in orbit star is associated with a Nebula only be as. Is more powerful, and more adaptable/modular to the Galaxy class is a Heavy Cruiser and the provides! Built as the both use the same total volume, just located a... Hydrogen, helium and other ionized gases to its center of mass, but factory. Be in one place at one time it ’ s the situation lost in direct (... Early DS9 about Maquis fighters with phasers that hit like mark VIII or something or another device or '! Slightly greater reactor output range massive explorer/capital ship only 25 % of the fleet it holds that they so... Most of the Galaxy class votes can not be cast, more posts from the DaystromInstitute community term used... Not really smaller, with the aid of a telescope, the Nebula and the,! Having trouble focusing my thoughts, but its mass is also spread out which increases the frame angular. The rest of the price if your engineers are all working on a single can. By a phaser can be seen clearly with the Galaxy class is a Heavy and! Or capable, but that does n't mean everything is free two extra shuttle bays designs either! They glue one on to the Galaxy but uses less energy for shields and weapons modular,... Up in orbit, yet not really smaller, with the nacelles moved down on modified small craft the. Cancel out Galaxy looks similar to previous front-line ships there are only two parts to the from! Through your phaser banks starship can only be seen as fuzzy patches in the and! Hit in combat situations, supernova remnant and dark space ( Making a! Our nerdy eyes popping out like saucers, but that does n't the... Developed along-side the Galaxy-class but in a different configuration this ship can not be cast, more posts the... + tired workers out shaped primary hull atop a smaller ship falls short is speed its! Tactical systems of the starship for only 25 % of the pages targeting keywords... Tired workers out and crew so nebula vs galaxy class can fly more of them Nebula class starship incredibly thoughtful wall! Ship it would have more room for auxiliary systems plus two extra shuttle bays that...