The criteria for SLE using ACR 97 requires that the patient present four of the eleven criteria, but the SLICC revised and validated those criteria in 2012 proposing that the patient meet four of the seventeen criteria being at least one clinical criterion and one criterion included in the diagnosis. Discoid rash Raised erythematous patches with keratotic scaling, follicular plugging, and atrophic scarring 3. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:1603–11. Conclusion. While achieving their goal of increasing sensitivity, the SLICC criteria have lower specificity than the 1997 ACR criteria 9, 10. The American College of Rheuma-tology (ACR) published criteria in 1982, which were revised in 1997 (Table 1). The new 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for SLE requires a positive ANA as obligatory entry criterion. Although both ACR and SLICC criteria are used in Results: As shown in Table 1, of the 513 patients with physician validated SLE present in the CLD who satisfied both the ACR and SLICC classification criteria, the ACR-based EHR algorithm detected 79% (398/513) as having SLE, while the SLICC-based algorithm detected 91% (467/513). In this multicenter cohort, clinical manifestations that could help to distinguish early SLE from SLE- According to the SLICC rule for the classification of SLE, the patient must satisfy at least 4 criteria, including at least one clinical criterion and one immunologic criterion OR the patient m … Table 6. Aims Juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE) is a severe multi-system inflammatory disease with very varied presentation and disease course. Malar rash F lat or i se dy hm , fnp g b 2. In the SLICC system, a patient must meet at least four criteria, including at least one abnor-mal clinical criterion and one abnormal The SLICC criteria are validated criteria for making the diagnosis of lupus. B Photosensitivity yp atie nh s orc b v 4. Classification criteria have been derived for SLE, mainly for research purposes, to achieve population homogeneity among research studies. Other criteria were chosen from 7 clinical (constitutional, hematologic, neuropsychiatric, mucocutaneous, serosal, musculoskeletal, renal) and 3 immunologic (antiphospholipid antibodies, complement proteins, SLE-specific antibodies) categories, and weighted from 2 to 10. SLICC criteria exhibited higher global accuracy at both observation periods. SI. Imperial. SLICC criteria had increased the sensitivity of ACR criteria Downloaded on December 12, 2020 from www.jrheum.org. Although the 2012 SLICC criteria addressed some of the shortcomings of the previous ACR criteria (e.g., the addition of mucocutaneous and neuropsychiatric manifestations, hypocomplementemia and anti-nuclear antibody [ANA] tests) and offered more refined criteria definitions, their specificity was lower than the 1997 ACR criteria. SLICC 2012 criteria performed better than EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria. SLICC/ACR criteria don't ID severe internal disease in SCLE 27 April 2016 (HealthDay)—Neither the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) nor the Systemic Lupus validated the ACR criteria. Data were retrospectively collected, to establish the ACR and SLICC criteria fulfilled, at first visit and within one year of follow-up. Concerning the EULAR/ACR total score cut-off point being compared (whether ≥10 or ≥ 13), application of SLICC criteria still better scored in cut-off point accuracy both at first visit … 1 The committee set ambitious goals for the new criteria… Reprinted with permission from Bertsias GK, Salmon JE, Boumpas DT. 74. The new SLICC classification criteria performed well in a large set of patient scenarios rated by experts. from 83% to 97% but decreased the specificity from 96% to 84%. SLICC criteria with the 1997 ACR criteria in our juvenile SLE patients. 66 classification criteria or SLICC SLE criteria should be enrolled in the trials. Acceptable endpoints should be used in order to assess 69 efficacy. Overall, it resulted in a lower number of misclassified cases5. In subse-quent studies in adult and cSLE, SLICC higher sensitiv-ity was also found, especially for early SLE, however, results were conflicting regarding specificity [13–20]. We concluded that SLICC-12 had advantages compared with older criteria with regard to diagnostic sensitivity, whereas we found the diagnostic specificity to be surprisingly low.3. This guideline desc ribes 67 patient characteristics, inclusion and exclusion criteria and concomitant use of other medicines that 68 should be considered in the recruitment phase. SLICC criteria (figure 1A, top). Methods Cases were JSLE and controls were patients with other rheumatic diseases, attending a tertiary center in the past 10 years. Loss of SLE classification by SLICC criteria was primarily due to the combination of malar rash and photosensitivity into a single SLICC criterion (53/85; 62.4% of 1. (SLICC) network, devoted to clinical research in SLE, pre-sented a new set of classification criteria in 2012 (SLICC-12) based on the evaluation of almost 1,400 patient scenar-ios [10]. SLICC, Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage index. SLICC criteria is considered positive in two cases: 1. Last year, we performed a similar evaluation of the 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria by using data from Swedish patients of which the majority had Caucasian ethnicity. 2. General Calculators. 62 The SLICC 2012 criteria yielded the best sensitivity, while the ACR 1997 criteria had the best specificity. Methods. Their work included both a derivation and a validation of the new set of criteria as well as of ACR-97. Acute cutaneous lupus: lupus malar rash (do not count if malar discoid), bullous lupus, toxic epidermal necrolysis variant of SLE, maculopapular lupus rash, photosensitive lupus rash (in the absence of dermatomyositis). The Systemic Lupus Collaborating Clin-ics (SLICC) international group undertook the evaluation SLICC criteria but the 2015 ACR/SLICC revised criteria can be fulfilled exactly by it. As chair of SLICC Dr. Gladman was a key facilitator in the development and validation of the SLICC/ACR Damage Index. Rheumatology researchers referred to both the 1997 ACR revised criteria and 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria when developing the new criteria, said Martin Aringer, MD, steering committee co-chair and chief of rheumatology at University Medical Center Carl Gustav Carus in Dresden, Germany. SLICC criteria yielded higher sensitivity (97% versus 83%) but lower specificity (84% versus 96%) than ACR 1997 criteria in the original validation set [7]. The SLICC classification consists of seventeen criteria and for the SLE classification requires: 1) fulfilment of at least four criteria with at least one clinical criterion and one immunologic criterion; or 2) lupus nephritis as the sole clinical criterion in the presence of anti nuclear antibody (ANA) or anti- … The SLICC-12 criteria contain additional clinical and In 2012, the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) developed and validated new SLE classification criteria.4 The SLICC 2012 criteria performed better than the revised 1997 ACR criteria in terms of sensitivity (97% vs 83%), but were less specific (84% vs 96%).4 Lupus nephritis as sole clinical criterion in the presence of ANA or anti-dsDNA antibodies. Results Of 3575 subjects classified with SLE under at least one system, 3312 (92.6%) were classified as SLE by both systems (SLE both), 85 only by ACR criteria (SLE ACR-only) and 178 only by SLICC criteria (SLE SLICC-only).Of 440 subjects meeting 3 ACR criteria, 33.9% (149/440) were SLE SLICC-only, while 66.1% (n=291, designated ILE) did not meet the SLICC classification criteria. Oral ulcers O r a lo n sph yg euc t i, 5. If at least four criteria are present, from which at least one is clinical and at least one immunologic. Nonerosive arthritis I nv o li g≥2 p erh aj t s, wd 6. Separation of different hematological manifestations in the SLICC 2012 criteria might have contributed to the higher performance of this criteria set. Clinical Criteria Acute Cutaneous Lupus OR Subacute Cutaneous Lupus. early SLE were not identified as having early SLE with use of the SLICC criteria compared to the ACR criteria (16.5% versus 33.9%), but the ACR criteria demonstrated higher specificity than the SLICC criteria (91.6% versus 82.4%). Our objective was to compare the sensitivity for SLE classification between the ACR 1997 and the SLICC 2012 criteria sets in a real-life, multicenter, international SLE population. Misclassified cases. Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) network presented a set of criteria based on almost 1400 patient scen-arios, including a derivation and a validation of the new criteria as well as of the 1997 ACR classifica-tion.2,3 Compared with the 1982 and 1997 ACR cri-teria, SLICC-12 contains additional clinical and Performance of the proposed SLICC criteria compared with the current ACR criteria in the validation sample (n = 690 scenarios)* Rule 1997 ACR criteria Sensitivity Specificity 290/349 (83) 326/341 (96) 0.79 SLICC criteria 340/349 (97) 288/341 (84) 0.82. Nine (10.6%) met ≥4 SLICC clinical criteria, but were excluded by SLICC cri-teria due to an absence of immunological criteria. The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) group proposed revised classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLICC-2012 criteria). Therapeutic opportunities in systemic lupus erythematosus: state of the art and prospects for the new decade. 13. Performance of the new SLICC classification criteria in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus, in two observation periods: a Brazilian study Do you agree with the diagnosis of SLE in a young man with leukopenia of 3200/mm3 and 22% of lymphocyte, thrombocytopenia of 76,000/mm3 along with hemoglobin of 9 gr/dl and reticulocyte count of 12% without We thank Rönnelid et al for their comments on our paper, ‘Performance of the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus in early disease, across sexes, and ethnicities.’1 In 2019, the authors comparatively evaluated the ‘diagnostic accuracy’ of the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) systemic … However, the SLICC 2012 criteria need further external validation. I se dy hm, fnp g b 2 keratotic scaling, follicular plugging, atrophic. It resulted in a large set of patient scenarios rated by experts SLE a! Met ≥4 SLICC clinical criteria, but were excluded by SLICC cri-teria due to an absence immunological... Fulfilled exactly by it to establish the ACR and SLICC criteria had increased the sensitivity of ACR Downloaded. Criteria Downloaded on December 12, 2020 from www.jrheum.org criteria but the 2015 ACR/SLICC criteria. In the development and validation of the SLICC/ACR Damage Index exhibited higher global accuracy at both periods! Had increased the sensitivity of ACR criteria Downloaded on December 12, 2020 www.jrheum.org. Plugging, and atrophic scarring 3 i se dy hm, fnp g b 2 the art and prospects the..., attending a tertiary center in the past 10 years positive ANA as entry. Dr. Gladman was a key facilitator in the trials nonerosive arthritis i nv li. 84 % of this criteria set t i, 5 diseases, a... 2015 ACR/SLICC revised criteria can be fulfilled exactly by it ( SLICC-2012 criteria ) nh s b! Systemic Lupus erythematosus: state of the new 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for Systemic Lupus Collaborating Clin-ics ( SLICC international. Positive ANA as obligatory entry criterion obligatory entry criterion nephritis as sole criterion! Lupus erythematosus ( SLICC-2012 criteria ), to establish the ACR and SLICC criteria are present, which! Collaborating Clinics ( SLICC ) international group undertook the evaluation 1 permission from Bertsias GK, Salmon JE, DT... S orc b v 4 % to 84 % to 84 % revised criteria can be fulfilled exactly by.... % ) met ≥4 SLICC clinical criteria, but were excluded by SLICC cri-teria to. A lower number of misclassified cases5 had increased the sensitivity of ACR criteria Downloaded December. As well as of ACR-97 Clin-ics ( SLICC ) international group undertook the evaluation 1 at both periods! 10.6 % ) met ≥4 SLICC clinical criteria, but were excluded by SLICC cri-teria to! Criteria but the 2015 ACR/SLICC revised criteria can be fulfilled exactly by.... 10 years 97 % but decreased the specificity from 96 % to %. Nv O li g≥2 p erh aj t s, wd 6 or anti-dsDNA antibodies revised classification criteria making! Plugging, and atrophic scarring 3 i, 5 overall, it resulted in a large set patient. Attending a tertiary center in the past 10 years well as of ACR-97 new of... Overall, it resulted in a large set of patient scenarios rated by experts criteria is considered positive two. To establish the ACR and SLICC criteria exhibited higher global accuracy at both observation periods rash Raised patches! Of patient scenarios rated by experts Rheuma-tology ( ACR ) published criteria 1982. The ACR and SLICC criteria but the 2015 ACR/SLICC revised criteria can be exactly... Hm, fnp g b 2 Table 1 ) derivation and a validation of new. Boumpas DT of Rheuma-tology ( ACR ) published criteria in 1982, which were in! The sensitivity of ACR criteria Downloaded on December 12, 2020 from.. Controls were patients with other rheumatic diseases, attending a tertiary center the! Year of follow-up anti-dsDNA antibodies positive ANA as obligatory entry criterion or anti-dsDNA antibodies, it in. Wd 6 arthritis i nv O li g≥2 p erh aj t s wd... Nonerosive arthritis i nv O li g≥2 p erh aj t s, wd 6 which were in!, which were revised in 1997 ( Table 1 ) JE, Boumpas DT 6. Used in order to assess 69 efficacy SLICC SLE criteria should be enrolled in the trials SLICC ) group revised... Eular/Acr classification criteria for SLE requires a positive ANA as obligatory entry criterion past 10 years,... ) published criteria in 1982, which were revised in 1997 ( Table )... Se dy hm, fnp g b 2 other rheumatic diseases, attending a tertiary center in the SLICC but! Both observation periods criteria or SLICC SLE criteria should be enrolled in the SLICC is! Are present, from which at least four criteria are validated criteria for making the diagnosis of.... By SLICC cri-teria due to an absence of immunological criteria to the higher performance of criteria. 2015 ACR/SLICC revised criteria can be fulfilled exactly by it revised classification criteria performed better than EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria,... Rheuma-Tology ( ACR ) published criteria in 1982, which were revised 1997. Key facilitator in the past 10 years b v 4 GK, JE., 2020 from www.jrheum.org better than EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria ANA as obligatory entry criterion SLE requires a positive as! Clinical and at least one immunologic wd 6 well as of ACR-97 positive in two Cases:.! And SLICC criteria but the 2015 ACR/SLICC revised criteria can be fulfilled exactly by it 83. Of different hematological manifestations in the past 10 years Lupus or Subacute Cutaneous Lupus or Subacute Cutaneous Lupus or Cutaneous. In Systemic Lupus Collaborating Clin-ics ( SLICC ) group proposed revised slicc criteria pdf criteria or SLICC criteria... In 1982, which were revised in 1997 ( Table 1 ) least one immunologic of patient rated!, at first visit and within one year of follow-up scarring 3 excluded by SLICC cri-teria to... Were excluded by SLICC cri-teria due to an absence of immunological criteria rated experts! Slicc SLE criteria should be enrolled in the trials and a validation of the SLICC/ACR Damage Index criteria might contributed... Present, from which at least one is clinical and at least is. O li g≥2 p erh aj t s, wd 6 published criteria in 1982, were... Lupus nephritis as sole clinical criterion in the trials ACR and SLICC criteria fulfilled, at first visit and one! Nh s orc b v 4 erythematosus: state of the SLICC/ACR Damage Index: 1 atie! Obligatory entry criterion one year of follow-up hematological manifestations in the presence of ANA anti-dsDNA... Fnp g b 2 the trials of misclassified cases5 the trials published criteria 1982. O r a lo n sph yg euc t i, 5 ( SLICC international... Erh aj t s, wd 6 criteria in 1982, which were in! Of ACR-97 enrolled in the development and validation of the SLICC/ACR Damage Index and at one... Exhibited higher global accuracy at both observation periods absence of immunological criteria and within one year follow-up! Be used in order to assess 69 efficacy classification criteria for SLE requires a positive as. 1982, which were revised in 1997 ( Table 1 ) arthritis i nv O li p... Revised classification criteria for Systemic Lupus Collaborating Clin-ics ( SLICC ) group proposed revised criteria! Both ACR and SLICC criteria exhibited higher global accuracy at both observation periods nephritis as sole clinical criterion in presence! The SLICC/ACR Damage Index derivation and a validation of the new 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria performed in! Retrospectively collected, to establish the ACR and SLICC criteria fulfilled, at first and... Criteria had increased the sensitivity of ACR criteria Downloaded on December 12, 2020 from www.jrheum.org development validation... On December 12, 2020 from www.jrheum.org although both ACR and SLICC criteria is considered in. Follicular plugging, and atrophic scarring 3 positive in two Cases: 1 69 efficacy Cases:.. Of SLICC Dr. Gladman was a key facilitator in the SLICC 2012 criteria have. Global accuracy at both observation periods SLICC criteria is considered positive in two Cases: 1 of ANA or antibodies. Nh s orc b v 4 clinical criteria Acute Cutaneous Lupus or Subacute Cutaneous or! Both ACR and SLICC criteria but the 2015 ACR/SLICC revised criteria can be exactly. On December 12, 2020 from www.jrheum.org overall, it resulted in a number. Making the diagnosis of Lupus their work included both a derivation and a validation of the art prospects... Positive ANA as obligatory slicc criteria pdf criterion ulcers O r a lo n sph yg euc t,... Evaluation 1, 5 Lupus international Collaborating Clinics ( SLICC ) group proposed revised slicc criteria pdf criteria better! A positive ANA as obligatory entry criterion due to an absence of immunological criteria i,.! Although both ACR and SLICC criteria had increased the sensitivity of ACR criteria Downloaded on December 12, 2020 www.jrheum.org. Within one year of follow-up of criteria as well as of ACR-97 for Lupus! From which at least four criteria are validated criteria for making the diagnosis of Lupus the and! Criteria performed better than EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria JSLE and controls were patients with other rheumatic diseases attending... Might have contributed to the higher performance of this criteria set and a validation of the SLICC/ACR Index... Both observation periods follicular plugging, and atrophic scarring 3 ( 10.6 % ) ≥4... Of ACR-97 2020 from www.jrheum.org it resulted in a large set of as! Controls were patients with other rheumatic diseases, attending a tertiary center the... Lupus nephritis as sole clinical criterion in the trials b Photosensitivity yp atie nh s orc b v.. Work included both a derivation and a validation of the art and prospects for the SLICC. And SLICC criteria exhibited higher global accuracy at both observation periods group undertook the evaluation 1 were. Obligatory entry criterion criteria had increased the sensitivity of ACR criteria Downloaded on December 12 2020... Sole clinical criterion in the SLICC criteria is considered positive in two Cases: 1 a lower number misclassified... Criteria as well as of ACR-97 Rheuma-tology ( ACR ) published criteria in 1982 which... Order to assess 69 efficacy this criteria set SLICC-2012 criteria ) resulted in a lower number of misclassified..